Author Topic: NYPA has spoken!  (Read 134 times)

Doug K

  • ECNA Co-Founder
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 977
  • Location: Brockport
    • ECNA US Website
Well well well, the moment of TRUTH has finally come, and Erie Canal Neighbors couldn't be happier.

Finally they will have the unsafe canal embankments that threaten their property repaired, and made safe again.

And of course, we also see the true nature of the social media campaign against the clearing of earthen dams start to play out, the meltdown of the Founder of the Stop the Canal Clear-cut movement. It wasn't about public safety for sure, and not really about saving trees or creating "SHADE" as the group avidly pointed out.

No it's really about "inclusion" and the "importance" of the Facebook Group's "leadership", who feels slighted and "are a little pissed off" that finally the New York State Canal Corporation has come to it's senses and dropped them entirely from the conversation... read below and what has been highlighted.

Elizabeth R. Agte - Posted to Facebook on February 11, 2022

On Monday, February 7th, Rebecca Hughes, Senior Director of Public Engagement for CC/NYPA wrote an email alerting the Monroe County Executive Bello, and the Town Supervisors, Hanna, Smith and Moehle that a hard copy letter was on the way to them as a response to their letter to Governor Hochul in December. The letter was written by Brian Stratton and Justin Driscoll. As you can see below that letter is just so much more blah, blah, blah. We have heard that wordsmithing for four years. Not impressed. I certainly donít need to point out the lack of shift change here, you all have been around this block as often as we have.

What has concerned us all week, is that there were not four signatures on that letter, there were six. Virginia Borden Maier and I also signed that letter, and did we get a reply, an acknowledgment that we are the engines of this grassroots effort to keep non-problematic vegetation and trees on the Historic Erie Canal? Clearly no.
It was a calculated and strategic decision on the part of CC/NYPA to exclude us from communications going forward. To the extent that they intentionally dismissed a third of the signatories, shows that even the largest state power authority in the country is willing to stoop to bad business manners and lack of professional protocol, because they donít know what else to do.
I donít know Justin, but shame on Brian with whom I have had polite conversations for four years now, have had pictures taken with him, and we have asked about each otherís families. I know we are on opposite sides of this debate but I always took Brian for a gentleman if nothing else. My bad.
Rebecca came on board, in large part I suspect, to contain us. Throughout the entire comment period last summer and into September, she kept repeating that she was there to listen, available for our concerns and questions. We want the stakeholders to know we are listening. We hear you! But in her email she clearly stated that any conversation going forward is going to be exclusively with elected officials only. When they trot out their ďred-linedĒ draft, the only ones who will be in the room to comment will be specifically NOT US, the stakeholders. Hypocrisy at itís finest.
My overarching concern is that NYPA has decided to entirely redact us. As in, Rebecca tried for a few split seconds (in the age of trees) to win us over, and it didnít work, because we could see that the program itself was not changing (we have been at this rodeo for a long time) and we didnít care if they send out gold detailed letters announcing the removal of the trees along the canal.

We still donít want the trees removed for no good reason. Period.
Stay tuned. We arenít sitting still. Cause we are just a little bit pissed off.


"They signed the letter", they are the "engines of the grassroots movement"... and the overarching concern for being "redacted" from the conversation? Really?

Seems like this group doesn't want anything to do with grass, or its roots. They are really a "tree roots movement" and sadly the trees and their roots are the bad guy when it comes to vegetation that is growing on "water impounding embankments" as NYPA has finally defined them. Of course this group claims they are all just hills or levees.

So this whole thing is not about shade now, it's really about whether Elizabeth and her pal Ginny, get a seat at the discussion table?

Just want to clarify for the audience reading...the group wasn't redacted... they were ELIMINATED from the conversation... period.

Here's what redacted means and how and why it's done...

How to Redact

If a record contains material that must be redacted, such as a social security number or unlisted phone number, redaction may be accomplished by using a visually obvious method that shows the requester the specific location of any redacted material in the record.

For example, if redacting a social security number or similar type of small-scale redaction, custodian's should:

Make a paper copy of the original record and manually "black out" the information on the copy with a dark colored marker;
Then provide a copy of the blacked-out record to the requester.

The blacked out area shows where information was redacted, while the double copying ensures that the requester will not be able to "see-through" to the original, non-accessible text. If "white-out" correction fluid is used to redact material, some visual symbol should be placed in the space formerly occupied by the redacted material to show the location of redacted material.

If full pages are to be redacted, the custodian should give the requester a visible indication that a particular page of that record is being redacted, such as a blank sheet bearing the word "Page redacted" or a written list of the specific page numbers being withheld. The purpose is to provide formal communication to the requester making it clear that material was not provided.

That is what REDACTION is... and this is what it would look like:

(NOTE: The redacted sections ADDED on this note are ONLY to EMPHASIZE what a redaction WOULD LOOK LIKE.
The words shown & "black-out marking" are NOT part of the original New York State Canal Corporation email or notices.)

Obviously this is not what happened. This facebook group, it's leaders especially, have not ever considered the safety of the public to be an issue, they labeled the Canal Corporation as "fear-mongers". The group led by Ms Agte has added NO VALUE to the solution for the problem of "unsafe earthen embankments", in fact they have caused more harm than good for their own community. They have cost the Canal Corporation hundreds of thousands of extra dollars, spent on creating a State Environmental Review and Embankment Clearing Manual that Towns asked for in a lawsuit. That lawsuit spurred on by this group's leaders.

And now the group, it's leaders, and the Three Towns have been told the same thing... sorry "shade" is not as important as public safety.

So, for the good of the Erie Canal, the good of all Canal Communities, and for the SAFETY of the general public & neighbors living below these dams...these two "crusaders" have been ELIMINATED, from the conversation about Erie Canal Embankments. That's right, eliminated from the discussion which is a much better word for the circumstances

On the bright side, the STCC group was instrumental in lowering the cost of embankment work in Perinton & Pittsford, along with all affected embankments that are part of the Earthen Embankment Integrity Program. The Canal Corporation originally planned to do a "restoration" of the embankments in these towns, but with the lawsuit that stopped them in 2018 so too went that plan to restore eastside canal dams, now the only allowed covering is grass or pollinators. No woody vegetation will be planted.

That is a savings of about $1.2 Million Dollars on the EEIP work there. That is what was paid for 1700 evergreens, dogwoods, and junipers that now line the top of the Embankment Dams along the Empire Trail in Brockport and most parts west.

And in gratitude, Mr. Stratton was seen showing Ms. Agte how to generate her own "shade" using common household items

« Last Edit: February 21, 2022, 09:49:22 am by Doug K »